mikki
19th March 2008, 04:47 AM
The judges comments on the case (abridged version)
IMO shes a money grabbing so and so, but thats just me rooowr :P
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7303080.s tm
The judge for the most part (like the majority of us it seems) seems to agree that the wifes side did not ring totally true in many cases. Over the years shes been an explosive self centred bitch in the media !
Judges quotes of interest:
From April 2003 the wife received an annual allowance of £360,000 payable quarterly. He made cash gifts to her of £250,000 in December 2002 and again in December 2003. The husband made a will to include the wife.
The wife says that the husband "turned down many opportunities to help my charities" and that his "refusal to commit" made any of his appearances on behalf of a charity much less effective.
I have to say that the facts as I find them to be do not support the wife's case.
The husband, I find, was generous towards the wife.
He denied he had lost his confidence [after the death of his first wife]. Her [the wife's] case that in some way she single-handedly saved him was exaggerated.
There are... examples, in my judgement, which, contrary to the wife's case, show that the husband was supportive of, or furthered, the wife's career.
IMO shes a money grabbing so and so, but thats just me rooowr :P
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7303080.s tm
The judge for the most part (like the majority of us it seems) seems to agree that the wifes side did not ring totally true in many cases. Over the years shes been an explosive self centred bitch in the media !
Judges quotes of interest:
From April 2003 the wife received an annual allowance of £360,000 payable quarterly. He made cash gifts to her of £250,000 in December 2002 and again in December 2003. The husband made a will to include the wife.
The wife says that the husband "turned down many opportunities to help my charities" and that his "refusal to commit" made any of his appearances on behalf of a charity much less effective.
I have to say that the facts as I find them to be do not support the wife's case.
The husband, I find, was generous towards the wife.
He denied he had lost his confidence [after the death of his first wife]. Her [the wife's] case that in some way she single-handedly saved him was exaggerated.
There are... examples, in my judgement, which, contrary to the wife's case, show that the husband was supportive of, or furthered, the wife's career.